2013/3/14 Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com>:
>> > I'm pretty sure it's necessary to distinguish the name of the
>> > structure from the name of the function. My recommendation
>> > is to rename the function to gf_get_data (and rename gf_set
>> > to gf_set_data to show that it is related). Another approach is
>> > to make the structure name a noun, so that one would write
>> > 'gf_data(...) to make a structure. I'm less enthusiastic about
>> > that. What do you think?
>>
>> gf_get_data and gf_set_data are OK by me.
>
>
> Won't that break everyone's code that uses the GF functions?
>
> Ray
Yes. gf_set is main entry point to the GF functions. If I change the
name I can leave the old gf_set