Installer for Windows, was: Maxima 5.30.0 / wxMaxima 13.04.1 Windows Binaries

I have caused confusion.  Sorry.  I am running Windows 7 Pro 64 bit and 
Maxima 5.30.0.  I don't fully understand this type of error.  I have never 
seen it before.  Here is the command line example of the error.  I changed 
"display2d" output manually.  Forgot to do it by using the flag.


Maxima 5.30.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net
using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.6 (a.k.a. GCL)
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
(%i1) load(draw);

Compiling /Maxima-5.30.0/share/maxima/5.30.0/share/draw/grcommon.lisp.
End of Pass 1.
End of Pass 2.
gcc: error: CreateProcess: No such file or directory
loadfile: failed to load 
C:/Maxima-5.30.0/share/maxima/5.30.0/share/draw/draw.lisp
-- an error. To debug this try: debugmode(true);
(%i2) C:/Users/Richard 
Hennessy/maxima/binary/binary-gcl/share/draw/grcommon.c:10905:1: fatal 
error: error writing to -: Invalid argument
compilation terminated.
draw2d(explicit(x^3,x,-2,2));
(%o2) draw2d(explicit(x^3 , x, - 2, 2))
(%i3) draw3d(explicit(x^3+y^3,x,-2,2,y,-2,2));
(%o3) draw3d(explicit(x^3+y^3,x,-2,2,y,-2,2))
(%i4) bug_report();

The Maxima bug database is available at
    http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=104933&group_id=4933&func=browse
Submit bug reports by following the 'Add new' link on that page.
Please include the following information with your bug report:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Maxima version: "5.30.0"
Maxima build date: "2013-05-26 22:52:00"
Host type: "i686-pc-mingw32"
Lisp implementation type: "GNU Common Lisp (GCL)"
Lisp implementation version: "GCL 2.6.6"
-------------------------------------------------------------
The above information is also reported by the function 'build_info'.



Rich

-----Original Message----- 
From: Richard Hennessy
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 2:36 PM
To: maxima at math.utexas.edu
Subject: Re: [Maxima] Installer for Windows,was: Maxima 5.30.0 / wxMaxima 
13.04.1 Windows Binaries

Sorry about this.  load draw does not work, but the draw, draw2d, draw3d
continue to work anyway.  I guess it is no longer necessary to load draw
before using it's functions.  My mistake.
Sorry,
Rich


-----Original Message----- 
From: Richard Hennessy
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 2:28 PM
To: maxima at math.utexas.edu
Subject: Re: [Maxima] Installer for Windows,was: Maxima 5.30.0 / wxMaxima
13.04.1 Windows Binaries

I tried the new installer.  Thanks, us Windows addicts have not had a new
version in a while.  I have not tested it out that much yet but I did notice
that load(draw) does not work.  Consequently I can't get draw, draw2d,
draw3d, etc to work.

Here is the error.

Maxima 5.30.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net
using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.6 (a.k.a. GCL)
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.

(%i1) display2d:false;

(out1) false
(%i2) load(draw);

Compiling /Maxima-5.30.0/share/maxima/5.30.0/share/draw/grcommon.lisp.
End of Pass 1.
End of Pass 2.
gcc: error: CreateProcess: No such file or directory
loadfile: failed to load
C:/Maxima-5.30.0/share/maxima/5.30.0/share/draw/draw.lisp
-- an error. To debug this try: debugmode(true);
(%i3) C:/Users/Richard
Hennessy/maxima/binary/binary-gcl/share/draw/grcommon.c:10836:1: fatal
error: error writing to -: Invalid argument
compilation terminated.



Richard Hennessy

-----Original Message----- 
From: Raymond Toy
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 12:24 PM
To: maxima at math.utexas.edu
Subject: Re: [Maxima] Installer for Windows,was: Maxima 5.30.0 / wxMaxima
13.04.1 Windows Binaries

>>>>> "Nico" == Nico Bredenbals <nbred at live.uni-paderborn.de> writes:

    Nico> Hey,
    Nico> 2) seems to be solved by a new Version from Andrej, I will
repackage the binary with
    Nico> this version.
    Nico> 1) I came across the two failed tests during "make check" of
maxima, but I thought they
    Nico> occured due to bogus tests:
    Nico> 99.25 - (397/4) = 99.25 - 99.25 = 0 which, while not beeing
simplified to its fullest,
    Nico> matches the expected result of 0. I'll see if I can find a newer
GCL version with ANSI
    Nico> support for windows and check if this changes the test result. Can
anyone confirm that
    Nico> this error does not occur on any other platform?
    Nico> BTW, running the testsuite with the current maxima 2.8 windows
release gives 2 errors
    Nico> not occuring with my 3.0 compilation:
    Nico> Running tests in rtest16:
    Nico> ********************** Problem 196 ***************
    Nico> Input:
    Nico>        60
    Nico>       2   - 1
    Nico> float(-------) - 1
    Nico>          60
    Nico>         2
    Nico> Result:
    Nico> - 1.1102230246251565E-16
    Nico> This differed from the expected result:
    Nico> 0.0
    Nico> ********************** Problem 197 ***************
    Nico> Input:
    Nico>        1000
    Nico>       2     - 1
    Nico> float(---------) - 1
    Nico>          1000
    Nico>         2
    Nico> Result:
    Nico> - 1.1102230246251565E-16
    Nico> This differed from the expected result:
    Nico> 0.0
    Nico> 619/621 tests passed
    Nico> From my point of view this is pretty accurate regarding 32Bit FP,
but I am no expert in
    Nico> this field and it's failed test non the less.

These are known issues with gcl.  While the error is small, it should
be zero.  I think the issue is that gcl is not correctly rounding.

Ray

_______________________________________________
Maxima mailing list
Maxima at math.utexas.edu
http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima