> If the substitute a lambda form for a function idiom stops working
> as I want it to, that's OK. I'll just write my own substitute :)
> How do you want it to work?
Oh, pretty much the way subst works now, I suppose. But I haven't thought about it all that much. Maybe if
an ev(XXX, 'lambda) was all that was needed, I'd be OK with that, I suppose.
--Barton