On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Stavros Macrakis <macrakis at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> That could be an effective workaround, but should sign be modifying the
> assume DB in the first place?
I dunno -- I am inclined to avoid the guts of the sign code,
and work around the edges instead (for the moment anyway).
I won't stop you if you want to tackle it head on ....
best
Robert Dodier