Rupert Swarbrick <rswarbrick at gmail.com> writes:
> Aleksej Saushev <asau at inbox.ru> writes:
>> This is a regression since 5.28 (and I think since 5.30):
>
> Ah, sorry. One version of your email was missing the quick
> fix. Unfortunately, that fix is wrong: it is possible to configure
> Maxima to build with more than one lisp in the same tree.
>
> As I said in the previous email, can you tell us more about your
> environment? What make are you using, for example? It seems bizarre that
> this doesn't work for you...
It doesn't seem bizarre since "bd_%" means "invoke target "bd_%""
and "$(addprefix $(subst bd_,binary-,$@),$(binary_subdirs))" is not
portable syntax:
"If string1 in a macro expansion contains a macro expansion,
the results are unspecified."
>> Quick fix for this is:
>>
>> --- src/Makefile.am.orig 2013-08-30 03:45:02.000000000 +0000
>> +++ src/Makefile.am
>> @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ uninstall-hook: $(WEIRD_UNINSTALL_TARGET
>> ## A rule to build binary directories of the form binary-<lispname>
>> ## and subdirectories ./numerical and ./numerical/slatec
>> binary_subdirs = / /numerical /numerical/slatec
>> -bd_%:
>> - $(MKDIR_P) $(addprefix $(subst bd_,binary-,$@),$(binary_subdirs))
>> +bd_$(DEFAULTLISP):
>> + for d in $(binary_subdirs); do $(MKDIR_P) binary-$(DEFAULT_LISP)$$d; done
>>
>> ## Some hunks of lisp that get used by more than one implementation
>> LOADDEFSYSTEM = (load "$(top_srcdir)/lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp")
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima at math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
--
BCE HA MOPE!