Better proposition tester than "is"?



As far as I know, "is" is the best we have.   The deficiencies of "is" have been discussed on this every so often.

I would be terrific if somebody would take on a project of improving the assume database, "is", simplification of
boolean valued expressions, and ...

--Barton

________________________________________

Hallo.

I'm sorry I'm asking such a simple question, but is there a better
proposition tester than is()? The function is() is really poor. Let us
assume this case:

assume(x>0,x<1,y>0,y<1);
is(x>0);
is(x+y>0);
is(x*y>0);
is(x+y<2);
is(x*y<1);

The first three questions are correctly answered true, but the last
two questions are unknown. Is there a (automatic) way around such
obvious problems?

Many thanks,
Michal
_______________________________________________
Maxima mailing list
Maxima at math.utexas.edu
http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima