Robert Dodier <robert.dodier at gmail.com> writes:
> On 2013-11-16, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm all for removing as many conditionals as possible, but do you
>> think that's wise? Or are we dropping support for gcl older than
>> 2.6.10?
>
> Oh, I dunno. Mostly I was just thinking out loud. I've never been
> happy about all the #+gcl stuff and it made me happy to think about
> getting rid of it. But there's really no hurry.
Maybe we can have an unofficial "deprecation date". Something like "when
a version of foolisp has been out for N years, we assume that all
occurrences of foolisp are at least that new" ?
I'd guess N=2 or so is reasonable (even Debian stable moves that fast!)
Rupert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/attachments/20131116/6cf96d54/attachment.pgp>;