GPL baloney



>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:

    Richard> 1. How about if we change the subject to
    Richard> reflect the topic, instead of using tired old
    Richard> thread names.

Ok.

    Richard> 2. The Macsyma source code circa 1982 is not
    Richard> covered by the Gnu public license.  It is at
    Richard> this point FREE software.  Byt contrast, the Gnu software

Is that really true?  If so, then why did Bill Schelter need to get
that letter from the DOE?  There must have been at least some
confusion on the true legal status of that code.

Ray