C Y wrote:
>
> One thing - Richard, I recall you wrote that Wolfram was initially a
> little distrubed by your mma parser, but then they sort of lost
> interest.
If any of the commerical folks should think we are looking
> too similar to them in whatever we wind up doing, will they get upset
> again? I don't know why they would given the basic similarity of
> pretty much every interface I've seen, but I figured I should at least
> pose the question.
Anyone can sue anyone else. I agree that the similarity of
the existing interfaces would defuse most suits.