dan.stanger@ieee.org writes:
> In a previous message to the list, I saw a bench mark that indicated
> that clisp was only about 30% slower then gcl. Wouldnt our time
> be better served by building the stuff in clisp that gcl has,
> which I thought was tk support, and then putting our time into cmucl
> and making it work on more platforms? clisp is a gpl'd product also,
> works on many more platforms than gcl. Plus, it implements CLOS,
> and many more features then gcl.
> Dan Stanger
Well, running lie symmetry calculations(SYMMGRP), clisp is slower by at least a
factor of 10!
Osman