On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Daniel Lemire wrote:
>I propose that expand be removed, or fixed. I suspect that if nobobody
>wants to fix it, the easier path would be to remove it (which I suspect
If it'd be removed, old code relying on it would break.
I don't recommend.
Has the expand worked before? I assume so, so what has caused it
to break? (This isn't an user error, or is it? I didn't follow
the thread closely).