On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
>(actually, shouldn't it be readline-init? At least it looks like it. Try
Looking the code more closely, it seems that init-readline is a wrapper
that calls readline-init. So I suppose it was ok anyway. I shouldn't talk
about code I am not familiar with...
But I don't see harm if trying to call directly readline-init with 4
arguments instead of init-readline with zero. Who knows if it would even
change something.