Ah! Yes, I didn't get the clue.
As far as the original fellow is concerned though, chances are that PLUS
won't have been defined...
There is something strong in this syntax though... isn't it???
If it were me, I would *require* that one use 'PLUS and not PLUS... I guess
I don't know enough lisp to understand...?
> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Lemire <daniel.lemire@acadiau.ca> writes:
>
> Daniel> I beg to differ...
>
> Did you try my example? Granted, I used an old gcl/maxima 5.6
> version, but I don't think that matters here. Your example works
> because PLUS hasn't been given a value. My example gives PLUS a value
> and thus doesn't evaluate to the symbol PLUS anymore....
>
> Ray