--- Daniel Lemire <daniel.lemire@acadiau.ca> wrote:
> Ah! Yes, I didn't get the clue.
>
> As far as the original fellow is concerned though, chances are that
> PLUS won't have been defined...
>
> There is something strong in this syntax though... isn't it???
>
> If it were me, I would *require* that one use 'PLUS and not PLUS...
> I guess I don't know enough lisp to understand...?
I'm confused - is there some reason PLUS shouldn't work? I'm quite
sure the natural impulse for most people would be to type PLUS rather
than 'PLUS. I concede it doesn't work, but maybe we should fix it so
that PLUS is acceptable in that instance? Or better still, allow left,
right, plus and minus as arguements?
CY
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/