Hi - I would prefer solution (2) for the same reasons; the volume of bug
reports at any future time could become quite large... Dave
Holmgren
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <vvzhy at mail>
To: "James Amundson" <amundson@fnal.gov>
Cc: "Maxima List" <maxima@www.ma.utexas.edu>
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2002 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Maxima] bug reports
> James Amundson ÐÉÛÅÔ:
> > I have not yet decided what to do with the mail that is generated by the
> > bug reports (including updates to the bug reports). Right now it goes to
> > me and me only. I had tried to forward it to the maxima list, but it
> > gets rejected because the mail comes from a "noreply@sourceforge.net",
> > which is not on the subscribers list. I see two options for the short
> > term:
> >
> > 1) I can forward the messages to the maxima list by hand. That would
> > mean I would forward a couple of dozen of messages from the last week or
> > so to the list at first. The steady-state flow is pretty minimal.
> >
> > 2) I could set up a maxima-bugs list at sourceforge.
> >
> > I am leaning toward (1). The subscribers to the list should let me know
> > asap if they prefer (2). Otherwise, I will start forwarding the recent
> > bug reports/updates to the list in a couple of days.
> >
>
> I'd prefer some automated solution - like (2).
> You can be tired or too busy or distracted by any other business.
> Right now bugs related traffic is quite small but who know
> about the future?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Vadim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima