I would suggest to add the list of working gcc versions to README.lisps.
This would help with gcl at least.
Valerij
On Monday 07 October 2002 07:40, James Amundson wrote:
> There are some problems with Clisp 2.30 and Maxima. I know 2.29 works
> well. I recommend sticking with Clisp 2.29 until this problem is
> resolved. I updated README.lisps with this information, but I neglected
> to commit my changes to CVS. Sorry. The information is in CVS now.
>
> It isn't clear to me yet whether the problems with Maxima and 2.30 are
> bugs in Maxima, bugs in Clisp, or both. My guess at this point is "both"
> but I don't know enough to be sure.
>
> --Jim
>
> On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 12:31, Justin Smith wrote:
> > I get:
> >
> > ;; Loaded file binary-clisp/mdefun.fas
> > ; - Loading module "numerical-functions"
> > ; - Loading binary file "binary-clisp/bessel.fas"
> > ;; Loading file binary-clisp/bessel.fas ...make[1]: ***
> > [binary-clisp/maxima.mem] Error 139
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/maxima/src'
> > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > [root@jsmith maxima]#
> >
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Maxima mailing list
> > Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
> > http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima