>>>>> "CY" == C Y <smustudent1@yahoo.com> writes:
CY> --- Raymond Toy <toy@rtp.ericsson.se> wrote:
>>
CY> Urk. What are the problems with the CMU xref? Also, any
>> pointers to
CY> the CMUCL xref and whoever is developing it?
>>
>> I haven't used xref in a long time but IIRC it had trouble when you
>> defined functions using macro/macrolet. There may have been other
>> issues. Not a problem with maxima, probably.
CY> That might explain one of the failures I enountered. There aren't all
CY> that many files that xref doesn't like - if i posted the failures do
CY> you think you could provide some insight? It sounds like you know how
CY> this stuff works better than I.
Maybe. But it's been a while. (Also a long time ago, I wrote a
simple interface from xref to garnet so that garnet would display the
call tree as a real tree.)
CY> Found the source - looks like CMUCL will have to be recompiled to
CY> support it. Ugh. Maybe I'll wait for the next binary release - I've
CY> had abysmal luck when I try to compile CMUCL.
Yes, it can be very difficult. If you want to try again sometime,
look me up and I'll try to help. The cmucl-imp list is helpful too.
Ray