The size of the XREF information is likely to be substantial and
so it may be more of a problem to use it than you might
at first think.
RJF
C Y wrote:
> --- Raymond Toy <toy@rtp.ericsson.se> wrote:
>
>> CY> Urk. What are the problems with the CMU xref? Also, any
>>pointers to
>> CY> the CMUCL xref and whoever is developing it?
>>
>>I haven't used xref in a long time but IIRC it had trouble when you
>>defined functions using macro/macrolet. There may have been other
>>issues. Not a problem with maxima, probably.
>
>
> That might explain one of the failures I enountered. There aren't all
> that many files that xref doesn't like - if i posted the failures do
> you think you could provide some insight? It sounds like you know how
> this stuff works better than I.
>
>
>>The CMUCL xref is done by Eric Marsden and was announced just today
>>on the cmucl-imp mailing list I think. He said binaries are
>
> available
>
>>in the experimental directory on www.cons.org. (Somewhere. I always
>>have to poke around to find it.)
>
>
> Found the source - looks like CMUCL will have to be recompiled to
> support it. Ugh. Maybe I'll wait for the next binary release - I've
> had abysmal luck when I try to compile CMUCL.
>
> CY
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima