> Cliff started to put together a Wiki, but we also didn't finish that.
> Would people be more comfortable with a FAQ?
> (I have to confess I would prefer to have a FAQ as long as someone
> wants to maintain it.)
The advantage of a Wiki is that it is easy to add to it.
The disadvantage of a Wiki is that it is easy for anyone to add to it.
Another disadvantage is that information is presented in too fragmented
a way.
The advantage of a FAQ is that it is edited.
The disadvantage of a FAQ is that it requires an editor.
Isn't there some intermediate solution?
I like Wiki's easy access, but it would be nice to have *a little* more
control, with some sort of user registration and vetting/editing
workflow.
I like Wiki's compartmentalization of subjects (one editing unit per
subject), but I don't like its compartmentalization of presentation (one
subject to a Web page). It would be nice to have more than one editing
unit presented per Web page.
I like FAQs' editorial unity. There is no way around the work required
to preserve this, but perhaps there is a way to have different levels of
vetting in the same hyperdocument.
Does anyone know of a better tool? And of servers which will let us run
it?
-s