I'm happy to edit the FAQ for now (give me a couple of days to make it
look like more than a toy), makefaq makes the formatting easy. You can
always go to a Wiki or other interactive thing later.
Judah
> > Cliff started to put together a Wiki, but we also didn't finish that.
> > Would people be more comfortable with a FAQ?
> > (I have to confess I would prefer to have a FAQ as long as someone
> > wants to maintain it.)
>
> The advantage of a Wiki is that it is easy to add to it.
> The disadvantage of a Wiki is that it is easy for anyone to add to it.
> Another disadvantage is that information is presented in too fragmented
> a way.
>
> The advantage of a FAQ is that it is edited.
> The disadvantage of a FAQ is that it requires an editor.
>
> Isn't there some intermediate solution?
>
> I like Wiki's easy access, but it would be nice to have *a little* more
> control, with some sort of user registration and vetting/editing
> workflow.
>
> I like Wiki's compartmentalization of subjects (one editing unit per
> subject), but I don't like its compartmentalization of presentation (one
> subject to a Web page). It would be nice to have more than one editing
> unit presented per Web page.
>
> I like FAQs' editorial unity. There is no way around the work required
> to preserve this, but perhaps there is a way to have different levels of
> vetting in the same hyperdocument.
>
> Does anyone know of a better tool? And of servers which will let us run
> it?
>
> -s