Andreas Eder wrote:
>
> On a completely different topic:
> do we really still need sloop instead of the standard loop?
Probably not, but no one wants to convert every occurrence and also test
every possible change that nothing broke. :-)
I think it should be left as is, but if you're fixing a bug and want to
convert from sloop to loop, that would probably be fine.
My 2 cents, anyway,
Ray