On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 11:30, Raymond Toy wrote:
> I'm mistaken. cmucl's letf doesn't do destructuring. In fact, I'm
> not really sure what letf does. It seems it's like let, but the
> variable is some kind of generalized place, instead of just variable.
>
> So maybe destructuring-let and destructuring-let* would be good (if
> long) names.
Good. I was going to make the same suggestions.
--Jim