>>>>> "James" == James Amundson <amundson@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
James> On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 11:30, Raymond Toy wrote:
>> I'm mistaken. cmucl's letf doesn't do destructuring. In fact, I'm
>> not really sure what letf does. It seems it's like let, but the
>> variable is some kind of generalized place, instead of just variable.
>>
>> So maybe destructuring-let and destructuring-let* would be good (if
>> long) names.
James> Good. I was going to make the same suggestions.
FWIW, I have patch that renames this and replaces all uses of
destructuring with destructuring-let/desctructuring-let*.
I have no idea if this catches everything; there might be macros
creating LET forms that assume destructuring which aren't tested by
compiling maxima or the test.
Ray