Re: maxima's private "let"



On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 07:49, Raymond Toy wrote:
> FWIW, I have patch that renames this and replaces all uses of
> destructuring with destructuring-let/desctructuring-let*.
> 
> I have no idea if this catches everything; there might be macros
> creating LET forms that assume destructuring which aren't tested by
> compiling maxima or the test.

I don't think there will ever be a better time to apply this patch. Go
ahead and do it.

--Jim