SLOOP -> ANSI LOOP translation



>>>>> "ole" == ole rohne <ole.rohne@cern.ch> writes:

    ole> I propose to get rid of the archaic SLOOP macro in favour of ANSI
    ole> LOOP. We've talked about this in the past, and IIRC the conclusion was
    ole> "ok, whenever GCL gets ANSI LOOP".

While not opposing this change, I think the nice thing about using
sloop is that everyone uses the same sloop implementation, unlike the
maze of twisty little implementations, all different, that is ANSI
loop.

Ray