missing simp



Barton Willis wrote:

>Conjecture:  If I  call  $ratsimp in some lisp code, I  shouldn't assume 
>the 
>result  is simplified.  Either the result of $ratsimp  should be cleaned 
>up 
>with simplifya, or something equivalent. 
>

You can assume that GCD has reduced numerator/denominator.  If the input 
was a ratio
of polynomials, it is in a canonical form.   If it has things like sqrt, 
sin, cos, etc, you might
want to call simplify or trigsimp or ....