Committing of patches and 5.9.2



Seeing as we now have a number of significant patches that have been
outstanding for a while (for example the IO and prompt work) I would
like to suggest we consider branching cvs into a 5.9.2 tree and the
usual experimental tree.  I haven't heard from Jim in a while so
perhaps there is a plan I am not aware of, but at this point I
personally would prefer to get the patches committed and bounce them
around/break them than have them linger so long.  A 5.9.2 tree would
allow for more careful mergers for the release and let us get a little
more daring with the main cvs trunk.  

Jim, if you're around does this sound like a good plan? 

Cheers,
CY


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail