>>>>> "James" == James Amundson writes:
James> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 11:08 -0700, C Y wrote:
>> Seeing as we now have a number of significant patches that have been
>> outstanding for a while (for example the IO and prompt work) I would
>> like to suggest we consider branching cvs into a 5.9.2 tree and the
>> usual experimental tree.
James> I agree that a branch for 5.9.2 is in order.
I can create the appropriate branch and label if necessary.
However, someone needs to decide when the branch should take place
(now?), and we need to come up with an appropriate naming convention
for labels (tags) and branch names.
How about release-5_9_2-base for the base of the branch,
RELEASE-5_9_2-BRANCH for the branch label? Various labels on the
branch will be release-5_9_2-. (Branch names in upper-case, tags
in lower case.)
Ray