bug report, or am I doing something wrong?



hello stavros,

> But it brings up another issue, which is that Unicode has a very rich
> collection of operator symbols which it would be nice to be able to use.  I
> don't know what the current situation is on Unicode support in our Lisps.
> Actually, the Unicode support doesn't even need to be very "deep", just
> something done in the front ends. After all, UTF-8 looks just like any other
> sequence of 8-bit codes, and only i/O and string operations care.  I would
> be happy even if string operations were ignorant of Unicode.

i'd like to see that. i don't know how to make it happen, though.

robert