proposal to modify op and args



On 5/7/06, van Nek <van.Nek at gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Am 7 May 2006 um 12:38 hat Robert Dodier geschrieben:
>
> op(<atom>);  --> < identity function>


So you are suggesting that op(x)=op(x[1])=op(x(1))?  That sounds like an
invitation to buggy code....

          -s