Raymond Toy wrote:
> Raymond Toy wrote:
> > I'll fix that and a few more mistakes soon.
>
> I think these issues are fixed now. I compiled all of this with gcl
> 2.6.7 and it seems to work.
Works on gcl-2.6.8 as well.
on 8 x 8 matrix
cmucl is fastest(took 0.00 seconds), sbcl is next (took 0.01 seconds)
and gcl (took 0.61 seconds)
The situation is reverse to compilation time where gcl was fast of all.
Happy New Year!
Valery