Valery Pipin wrote:
> Raymond Toy wrote:
>
>> Raymond Toy wrote:
>>
>>> I'll fix that and a few more mistakes soon.
>>>
>> I think these issues are fixed now. I compiled all of this with gcl
>> 2.6.7 and it seems to work.
>>
> Works on gcl-2.6.8 as well.
> on 8 x 8 matrix
> cmucl is fastest(took 0.00 seconds), sbcl is next (took 0.01 seconds)
> and gcl (took 0.61 seconds)
> The situation is reverse to compilation time where gcl was fast of all.
>
>
Thanks for testing this stuff out. It seems to be in reasonable shape
as a share package, but Robert said to put it into src, so I'll move
things around for that and check stuff in sometime soon.
Happy New Year!
Ray