On 3/3/07, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Vadim wrote:
> >> ? foo - exact search
> >> ?? foo - inexact search as substring
I have this functionality implemented in my local sandbox.
I'll commit it today or tomorrow.
> As do I, except that I'd like "? foo" to do what it does today, and "??
> foo" do the new thing (exact search).
> I see no reason to gratuitously change the behavior of ?.
Ray, of the 6 people who've recently voiced their opinions on this
proposal (in this thread and another one from a few days ago),
you're the only one who is opposed.
best,
Robert