Daniel Lakeland writes:
>
> ? falls back to the ?? functionality when no exact match can be found,
> and says "no exact match found, falling back to inexact matching"
>
Well, I don't think I like this "fall back" mechanism.
It may be very confusing. With such behavior if I request
? foo
and command returns some text then I can't be sure
whether this is really description of foo or of some barfoobaz.
It is better if exact search will be strictly exact
but if no exact match found we can print message
which suggest to use ??. We even can check
existence of inexact matches and inform the user
that some exist but not perform such search without
explicit user request
?? foo
--
Vadim V. Zhytnikov
<vvzhy at mail.ru>
<vvzhy at netorn.ru>