Simple re-writing of integral



Albert.Reiner at ecs.steyr.com schreef:
> 
> Is there a built-in way of getting Maxima to recognize that
> 
> (%i92) integrate(diff(z(x+t), x), x, 0, 1);
> 
> (%i93) integrate(diff(z(x+t), x), t, 0, 1);
 >
> should both return the same (viz., the former) result?

Are you sure they are the same? I can see that

integrate(diff(z(x+t), t), t, 0, 1);

is the same is %i92, but I don't think %i93 is the same too.

-- 
If I have been able to see further, it was only because I stood
on the shoulders of giants.  -- Isaac Newton

Roel Schroeven