Robert Dodier wrote:
> On 5/5/07, Andreas Eder <aeder at arcor.de> wrote:
>
>> > I think this is wrong. integration_constant_counter is a documented
>> > variable. This used to do something with it. Now it doesn't and you
>> > get some random integer appended to integrationconstant.
>>
>> Yes, you are right. integration_constant_counter is a documented
>> variable, but you were not supposed to do something with it. Its
>> only use was to generate a fresh, unique symbol each time - just
>> what the gentemp does.
>
> Well, GENTEMP is not exactly the same in this case, because
> the integration_constant_counter is under control of the integration
> code; omitting integration_constant_counter here causes a user-
> visible change of behavior.
>
BTW, gentemp is deprecated. Doesn't clisp warn about using gentemp
since it is deprecated?
Ray