On 5/14/07, Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
> I think that throwing out ratpoi entirely would be a mistake. Appropriate
> documentation could explain its purpose and allow interested persons to
> construct the rational (CRE) coefficient version.
> Perhaps conditionalizing the code somehow like #+RATPOIS (......)
Agreed w/ RJF here.
If the Poisson + CRE stuff is not called from anywhere now --
let's create a new Lisp package (by this I mean defpackage)
and put the Poisson + CRE stuff in it.
Otherwise, let's rename any externally visible functions to
POISSON-CRE-FOO to resolve the name collisions.
FWIW
Robert