Richard Fateman wrote:
> I think that throwing out ratpoi entirely would be a mistake.
> Appropriate documentation could explain its purpose and allow interested
> persons to construct the rational (CRE) coefficient version.
> Perhaps conditionalizing the code somehow like #+RATPOIS
> (......)
Yes, fine with me. The main point for me is getting rid of the
annoying function redefinitions (and the accompanying warnings).
> The point is that under some circumstances the RATPOIS setting would run
> important problems 1000X faster...
> This is not something that the test suite tests for.
Ok, but I looks like the rest of the supporting infrastructure for
that is missing. Anyway conditionalizing that code is probably
the best solution - or do what Robert Dodier suggested:
>If the Poisson + CRE stuff is not called from anywhere now --
>let's create a new Lisp package (by this I mean defpackage)
>and put the Poisson + CRE stuff in it.
>
>Otherwise, let's rename any externally visible functions to
>POISSON-CRE-FOO to resolve the name collisions.
I leaver it up to you to decide.
Andreas