On 5/28/07, Vadim V. Zhytnikov <vvzhy at mail.ru> wrote:
> First, Introduction needs some small update.
> Example for ? integ is actually for ?? integ .
> It is not possible just to replace ? by ??
> since preceding text doesn't mention ?? but
> only ?. Besides describe output in this example
> is not up to date.
Vadim, please go ahead and correct the errors that you have noted.
Although you are not a native speaker of English, your
ability with the language is certainly sufficient to make
corrections such as these, and in any case the reference
manual is something less than a work of literature.
> Second, I propose to rename section Symmetries.
> The term Symmetry has too broad meaning in math
> and physics. But this section describes something
> very specific - package sym which deals with
> symmetric polynomials. IMHO tis section
> should be named accordingly.
OK, how about "Symmetric Polynomials" or "Polynomial
Symmetries" or ... ?
All the best,
Robert