Robert Dodier writes:
>
> Agreed 100%. I've always thought the "Definitions for foo"
> is clumsy. I think those sections should be renamed in
> all languages. "Functions and Variables for foo" is OK by me.
>
I see that you committed Definition->Functions patch to
Maxima CVS. Thank you! But I see two other problems
with current documentation.
First, Introduction needs some small update.
Example for ? integ is actually for ?? integ .
It is not possible just to replace ? by ??
since preceding text doesn't mention ?? but
only ?. Besides describe output in this example
is not up to date. But this is probably OK
since we are not going to update Introduction
with every manual update.
Second, I propose to rename section Symmetries.
The term Symmetry has too broad meaning in math
and physics. But this section describes something
very specific - package sym which deals with
symmetric polynomials. IMHO tis section
should be named accordingly.
With best regards,
Vadim
--
Vadim V. Zhytnikov
<vvzhy at mail.ru>
<vvzhy at netorn.ru>