Robert Dodier writes:
> On 5/28/07, Vadim V. Zhytnikov <vvzhy at mail.ru> wrote:
>
>> First, Introduction needs some small update.
>> Example for ? integ is actually for ?? integ .
>> It is not possible just to replace ? by ??
>> since preceding text doesn't mention ?? but
>> only ?. Besides describe output in this example
>> is not up to date.
>
> Vadim, please go ahead and correct the errors that you have noted.
OK, I'll do this. Maybe I'll try to find other convenient
example.
>
>> Second, I propose to rename section Symmetries.
>> The term Symmetry has too broad meaning in math
>> and physics. But this section describes something
>> very specific - package sym which deals with
>> symmetric polynomials. IMHO tis section
>> should be named accordingly.
>
> OK, how about "Symmetric Polynomials" or "Polynomial
> Symmetries" or ... ?
>
AFAIK first option is right choice.
--
Vadim V. Zhytnikov
<vvzhy at mail.ru>
<vvzhy at netorn.ru>