Subject: planning to tag 5.14 release branch circa Dec 2
From: Vadim V. Zhytnikov
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:34:12 +0300
Robert Dodier writes:
> On 11/20/07, Daniel Gildea <gildea at cs.rochester.edu> wrote:
>
>> May I suggest including imaxima in the maxima distirbution?
>
> OK by me. It is GPL v2 so it is the same license as Maxima,
> no problem there. It is not very big. The only question I have
> at this point is to what extent the compiled .elc files are portable.
> Can we arrange for make to build the .elc files and package them
> with the rest of Maxima? I assume the answer is yes but I really
> know almost nothing about Emacs.
>
First of all, we probably have to ask opinion of
current imaxima developer and maintainer Yasuaki Honda.
Secondly - imaxima relies on breqn.sty of
unknown license.
As for .elc files - I don't see any need to distribute
.elc files. I'm not 100% sure that they are the same
for different emacs versions. Compile or not
emacs lisp files is the question of local installation
not the question of distribution. In any case we
can add optional .el compilation in Maxima
automake/autoconf machinery. Maybe the right
strategy should be: if configure finds emacs then
compile and install .elc with option to turn this
off.
--
Vadim V. Zhytnikov
<vvzhy at mail.ru>
<vvzhy at netorn.ru>