David Ronis wrote:
> I'm running on an i686-linux-gnu box, using CLISP 2.39. (I know that
> this is a bit old and I'll upgrade and repeat the tests).
I'll try this on an x86 box soon. Note that clisp 2.39 may have the
following annoying bug:
(cis 22.776546738526d0) -> -1
or something like that instead of #c(-0.707 -0.707).
Ray