Raymond Toy (RT/EUS) wrote:
> David Ronis wrote:
>> I'm running on an i686-linux-gnu box, using CLISP 2.39. (I know that
>> this is a bit old and I'll upgrade and repeat the tests).
>
Tried this on an x86 box with cmucl. I see the following errors. I
think it just means x86 is off a little from sparc. I'll update the
tests to use 14 digit precision instead of 15.
Ray
********************** Problem 175 ***************
Input:
test_bessel(bessel_j(- 2.3, - 1.5), .5949438455752484 -
.8188699527453657 %i,
15)
Result:
1.332267629550188e-15
This differed from the expected result:
true
********************** Problem 176 ***************
Input:
test_bessel(bessel_j(- 2.3, 1.5), 1.012178926325313, 15)
Result:
1.554312234475219e-15
This differed from the expected result:
true