On 7/24/08, Dieter Kaiser <drdieterkaiser at web.de> wrote:
> expintegral_e (n z) - Exponential Integral En
> expintegral_e1 (z) - Exponential Integral E1
> expintegral_ei (z) - Exponential Integral Ei
> logintegral_li (z) - Logarithmic Integral Li
> expintegral_si (z) - Exponential Integral Si
> expintegral_ci (z) - Exponential Integral Ci
> expintegral_shi (z) - Exponential Integral Shi
> expintegral_chi (z) - Exponential Integral Chi
I like this naming scheme better.
> These names should emphasize that all this functions are sumerized as
> Exponential Integrals. But to be consistent we have to use for Li the name
> expintegral_li and not logintegral_li. I have chosen expintegral_li in my last
> revision of the code.
I think I like logintegral_li better, but either way it is OK by me.
best
Robert Dodier