Well,
I wrote, I couldn't believe that mlistp wasn't defined. So it is defined and always lies 1 mm
before my eyes.
How do we proceed now with listarith and matrices?
Volker
Am 20 Nov 2008 um 20:19 hat Viktor T. Toth geschrieben:
> Indeed. Well, I claim innocence and blame Volker <grin>
>
> I dropped mlistp and replaced it with $listp, and Volker's patches still
> work fine as intended, so I have committed them. Thanks for pointing this
> out!
>
>
> Viktor
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barton Willis [mailto:willisb at unk.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:05 PM
> To: Viktor T. Toth; 'van Nek'
> Cc: Maxima at math.utexas.edu
> Subject: mlistp in simp
>
>
> The function $listp is defined in comm.lisp. I don't think we need to
> define mlistp in
> simp.lisp (CVS version 1.61), do we? The function $listp is a bit more
> careful than
> mlist, by the way.
>
> Barton
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima at math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima