Subject: Maxima by Example: Ch. 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11
From: Stavros Macrakis
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:24:43 -0400
As I've said before, I am not competent to judge the content of Evans' work.
However, I do recognize the (linguistic) warning signs of an INTERNATIONAL
CONSPIRACY BY OCCULT FORCES TO SUPPRESS THE TRUTH. Evans HAS BEEN NOMINATED
for knighthood (and a Nobel!), but it has been denied to him. Formal
complaints HAVE BEEN RAISED with authorities. Einstein and Cartan ARE NAMED
as coauthors. Criminal charges are POSSIBLY PENDING. Evans is the NEW
VELIKOVSKY (not the NEW GALILEO?!).
-s
-- I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
-- Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call*
* for them? *...*
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Dave Feustel <dfeustel at mindspring.com>wrote:
> Hi Edwim,
>
> I did not intend to post any more remarks about this topic since
> there seems to be no perceptible interest in verifying Evans'
> work using Maxima. Instead, I am pursuing my own little
> investigation using Maple 12 and a Verrry interrrestink Maple
> addon called Atlas, available from digi-area.com.
>
> I would like to point out that Bruhn and several others have been under
> international investigation for aggravated criminal harrassment of Dr
> Evans and usurpation of Dr. Evans' mailing lists for spamming. Formal
> complaints have been raised with authorities in England, America, and
> several European Countries. Official warnings and cautions have been
> sent to Bruhn and others. Criminal Charges are possibly pending. Dr.
> Evans has been subject for YEARS to sustained abuse from Bruhn and
> others, the like of which I had not previously encountered in an
> academic setting. I would not make use of Bruhn as a critic of Dr. Evans
> since Bruhn (and his buddies as well) has clearly demonstrated that he
> is a low-life (IMHO). Note also that Springer dishonored a signed
> contract with Dr. Evans regarding publishing of at least one of Evans'
> books. Note also that Evans has been repeatedly denied the right of
> reply by 'reputable' journals to (incompetent) criticism of his theories
> published in those journals. The treatment of Dr. Evans by the physics
> establishment is quite reminiscent of the despicable treatment of
> Immanuel Velikovsky by physicists last century. Velikovsky is having the
> last laugh, though. I have great admiration for Dr. Evans both because
> I believe his ECE theory is a landmark in GR and also because of the way
> Dr. Evans is overcoming the calummy to which he has been unfairly
> subjected. I fully expect Dr. Evans to receive a Nobel Prize at some
> point. I apologise for running on.
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:05:05PM -0700, Edwin Woollett wrote:
>
> > On 29 Apr 2009, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > Have you thought about including a chapter on tensor calculus and
> > differential geometry with reference to General Relativity?
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > I have thought of writing such a chapter, but not in this
> > series of tutorials for the beginning serious user of Maxima.
> >
> > Maxima needs more intelligent discussions of both math and
> > science topics, with enough quality and depth to attract the
> > attention of college instructors.
> >
> > I initially wrote several chapters around the focus of
> > computational physics, but when I saw the kinds of
> > questions appearing on the Mailing List, I realised that
> > a general introduction to the use of Maxima would be
> > much more helpful, and would also encourage me to learn
> > more about the subtleties of Maxima.
> >
> > I still have a part of my brain thinking about another
> > series of chapters, for another "book", concentrating
> > on physics, which happens to be what I am most
> > familiar with.
> >
> > I taught general relativity for beginners
> > (using Bernard Schutz: A First Course in General
> > Relativity) and cosmology for beginners (at the
> > level of J. N. Islam: An Introduction to Mathematical
> > Cosmology) for a mixture of physics seniors and
> > graduate students at Cal. State, Long Beach.
> >
> > (But most of my teaching experience was with
> > plasma physics, astrophysics, and elementary
> > particle phenomenology.)
> >
> > I am sure there are both lurkers and active participants
> > who are better qualified to write a good technical
> > introduction to both differential geometry and
> > general relativity (with Maxima embedded) than yours truly.
> >
> > As to Myron Evans "Grand Covariant Unified
> > Field Theory (GCUFT)", a quick google brought
> > up an apparently serious critic who (with colleagues)
> > has lavished time and energy on refuting this theory:
> > Gerhard W. Bruhn, Department of Mathematics,
> > Darmstadt University of Technology,
> > see the page:
> > http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/GCUFT.html<http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/%7Ebruhn/GCUFT.html>
> >
> > and also the short pdf file," Some fatal shortcomings
> > of the ECE theory":
> > http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/connection170209.pdf<http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/%7Ebruhn/connection170209.pdf>
> >
> > A Feb. 08 posting by Bruhn on the
> > http://arxiv.org/ preprint site for physics and math is:
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > arXiv:0705.3030
> > http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0705/0705.3030v2.pdf
> > The Evans Lemma of Differential Geometry
> > February 1, 2008
> > Abstract:
> > The Evans Lemma is a basic tool for Evans GCUFT or ECE Theory [2].
> > Evans has given two proofs of his Lemma. The first proof in [1] is shown
> to
> > be invalid due to dubious use of the covariant derivative D?. A second
> proof
> > in [2, Sec.J.3] is wrong due to a logical error.
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > Ted Woollett
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima at math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
>
>