Raymond Toy <raymond.toy at stericsson.com> writes:
>Who says we have to be POSIX compliant. :-)
Well, I think we should not gratuitiously deviate from it. ( noted
the smiley)
>But we shouldn't gratuitously be non-compliant.
Right!
>Or we can use CL getopt_long as Leo suggests.
Yes, I think this is the way to go. If it really is POSIX
compliant and does what we want - why should we reinvent the wheel?
Andreas
--
ceterum censeo redmondinem esse delendam.