Incompatible changes .. was Re: Program stack overflow defining infix operator
Subject: Incompatible changes .. was Re: Program stack overflow defining infix operator
From: Richard Hennessy
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:59:06 -0400
Just use Barton's %if, et al and leave what works alone.
Rich
----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Fateman
To: Robert Dodier
Cc: Maxima List
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 2:53 PM
Subject: Incompatible changes .. was Re: Program stack overflow defining infix operator
I think that an open source sourceforge project should rely on building a consensus before making incompatible changes.
In this instance, I vote no. I do not know how others feel, but perhaps one can find out more systematically.
see surveymonkey.com
for example.
Note that I am not against "boolean simplification", just against altering the semantics of the programming language to do it.
RJF
Robert Dodier wrote:
On 8/9/09, Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
To the extent that these proposals seem to raise huge issues with
incompatibility with previous programs, I think they should not be
implemented.
Sorry, I don't care. "It has been messed up for decades" doesn't
carry any weight for me.
FWIW
Robert Dodier
_______________________________________________
Maxima mailing list
Maxima at math.utexas.edu
http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Maxima mailing list
Maxima at math.utexas.edu
http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima