> > What would be better in the case of changes (especially where the original
> > use is unclear) is a positive action -- a confirmation of correctness --.
> >
> > That is, someone else has looked at the proposed change, and positively
> > asserts that he (or she) thinks this is a correct change.
>
> I've thought about the possibility of requiring 2nd-party review
> before committing changes. I don't think it would help.
I generally agree. However perhaps we can improve the review by somehow
marking "If no one objects" mails in the subject. Ie prepending the
subject with "Please review: " ...
Harald